About Bayser

Careers

Publications, Conferences and Tutorials

Contact Us

SERVICES

Compliance & Persistence
Patient Prescription Behavior
Physician Networks
Hospital-Retail Spillover
Patient-Level Targeting
Other Services

PRODUCTS

Individual Patient Behavior Tool
Rx Tracker
MC Viewer/Targeter
Deal Finder
Look-See Pipeline
Bayser Aligner

DOWNLOADS

Slot Machine
Rat Race of Healthcareville
Oncology Cards

Bayser Consulting
Skokie, IL 60076

Peers of Influence Abstract

The majority of techniques for targeting physicians leave stacks of money on the table, for they focus entirely on the prescription habits of the physician and leave out altogether the everyday working relationships that tie physicians together. In short, physicians are regarded as individu­als whose decisions are not in the least influenced by their peers. This is surprising. Any marketer intent on selling toys knows not only should the interest of the child be aroused so the child can pester mom to make the purchase, but also mom needs to be reassured of the educational value of the toy to justify open­ing her purse. The marketer knows right off the bat the focus ought to be the mom-child pair. How then can the pharmaceutical marketer keep on ignoring relationships?

Not surprisingly, it dawned on pharmaceutical marketers there is something wrong with this picture. A sensible marketing strategy ought to encompass not only physicians that write a lot of scripts but also physicians that have the ability to influence physicians that write a lot of scripts. So a few years ago, the industry started rolling out medical scientific liaisons, a new breed of high-caliber professionals - includ­ing pharmacists and physicians - to reach the upper echelons of the mighty medical community in a bid to influence the influencers. But while this two-pronged approach has the benefit of not ignoring medical thought leaders, it is not the panacea. First, it is not clear which physicians the scientific liaisons should call on, for what constitutes an opinion leader is vague. Second, working relationships between influencers and high writers are not recognized and as a result cannot be leveraged. This is due to the "silo" deploy­ment of regular sales reps to call on high writers on the one hand and medical scientific liaisons to call on influencers on the other. Third, there is no satisfactory model to gauge the return on investment of calling on influencers. Medical scientific liaisons are regarded as mere cost of doing business: Their contribution is whatever it is (hopefully positive).
 

Enter molecular targeting.
 

If you would like a copy of this publication please call (847) 920-1000 or e-mail bayser@bayser.com
Testimonials:

“One of the brightest individuals that I've met in my career. JP has an incredible skill regarding simplifying issues, and preparing presentations for senior management." -- Director, Large Pharmaceutical Company

“Extremely brilliant and gets it right away.” --Director, Large Pharmaceutical Company

“Very professional!” --VP, Large Medical Devices Company

“JP and I are a great team. I get all kinds of ideas and he gets them implemented.” --VP, Large Pharmaceutical Company

“Always does quality work.” --Director, Large Medical Devices Company

"The amount of knowledge that they bought, not only about their tools but about the industry & tool applications.” --Market Researcher, Large Pharmaceutical Company

“I am very pleased with Bayser’s work. ” --Director, Large Diagnostics Company

“A real guru at Excel. Taught me everything I know about spreadsheets.” --Account Manager, Large Diagnostics Company

Reaction to a demo of Bayser’s Rx Tracker: “I am having an out-of-body experience right now.” --VP, Large Pharmaceutical Company

 

 

All contents copyright 2002 Bayser Consulting, (847) 920-1000